RoboCup Simulation League: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 2 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5) (Pancho507 - 22012
Filled in 1 bare reference(s) with reFill 2
Line 30:
As of 2010, a direct comparison of the gameplay of the 2D and 3D leagues shows a marked difference.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.ustream.tv/discovery/recorded/all?q=robocup+simulation |title=Videos from Japan Open 2010 |access-date=2010-06-14 |archive-date=2012-10-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121015192057/http://www.ustream.tv/discovery/recorded/all?q=robocup+simulation |url-status=dead }}</ref> 2D league teams are generally exhibiting advanced strategies and teamwork, whereas 3D teams appear to struggle with the basics of stability and ambulation. This is partly due to the difference in age of the two leagues, and partly to the difference in complexity involved in building agents for the two leagues. Replaying log files of finals over the recent years shows progress is being made by many teams.
 
In the 2D system, movement around the plane is achieved via commands from the agents such as ''move'', ''dash'', ''turn'' and ''kick''.<ref>[http{{Cite web|url=https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawikiprojects/sserver/index.php?|title=Users_Manual/Soccer_Server#Player_ControlThe PlayerRoboCup controlSoccer commandsSimulator|date=July on18, project wiki]2017|website=SourceForge}}</ref> The 3D system has fewer command choices for agents to send, but the mechanics of motion about the field are much more involved as the positions of 22 hinges throughout the articulated body must be simultaneously controlled.
 
==References==