Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Display:none exploit: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Display:none exploit]]: Delete |
|||
Line 5:
* '''Delete''' no credible evidence that this is encyclopaedic. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 11:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. This is not a vulnerability/attack. What's next? The img "exploit" that allows websites to display goatse to its visitors? :) --- [[User:RockMFR|RockMFR]] 14:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' This isn't an exploit per se. It's a technique that was once widely used ''as part'' of some exploits and by SEO companie/link spammers (just like using text-indent et al. to have content rendered but not displayed). The fact that the article doesn't make this obvious is quite telling, in my humble opinion. Anyway, it's a non-issue anyway and I feel the "exploit" in itself isn't notable enough, not to mention that fact that the article is unsourced. [[User:Seed 2.0|Seed 2.0]] 21:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
|