Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Display:none exploit: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →[[Display:none exploit]]: Rewording. |
→[[Display:none exploit]]: Delete |
||
Line 6:
*'''Delete'''. This is not a vulnerability/attack. What's next? The img "exploit" that allows websites to display goatse to its visitors? :) --- [[User:RockMFR|RockMFR]] 14:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' This isn't an exploit per-se. It's a technique that was once widely used ''as part'' of some exploits and by SEO companies/link spammers (just like using text-indent et al. to have content rendered but not displayed). The fact that the article doesn't make this obvious is quite telling, in my humble opinion. Anyway, it's pretty much a non-issue and I feel the technique in itself isn't notable enough, not to mention that fact that the article is completely unsourced. [[User:Seed 2.0|Seed 2.0]] 21:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''; no sources, so the article fails [[WP:V]] and [[WP:RS]]. <span style="border: #AAF solid 4px; background: #11E; padding: 1px; margin-right: .5em;">[[User talk:Crotalus horridus|<font color="#AAF"><b><tt>*** Crotalus ***</tt></b></font>]]</span> 00:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
| |||