Talk:Scikit-learn: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:31, 4 February 2024

Revision as of 15:04, 3 March 2025

Line 8:

I don't think a version history section (originally added by [[Special:Contributions/2605:6001:E444:E300:494C:CC81:3FE:D6AB|2605:6001:E444:E300:494C:CC81:3FE:D6AB]]) is appropriate for this particular software library, especially if it's just a list of the major versions released so far. The sentences discussing past major development efforts or milestones mostly duplicate what the [[Scikit-learn#Overview|→Overview]] section says. — [[User:ChrstphrChvz|ChrstphrChvz]] ([[User talk:ChrstphrChvz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ChrstphrChvz|contribs]]) 08:50, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

== Update and add more information ==

The current wiki article covers the history, development, and basic features of the library, but there are a few areas where additional details could enhance the content:

- The wiki article for [[TensorFlow]] has an Applications section. This article could do the same using the [https://scikit-learn.org/stable/testimonials/testimonials.html Testimonials] as inspiration

- The wiki article for [[XGBoost]] has an Awards section. This article could do similarly to mention e.g. [https://blog.scikit-learn.org/press/frenchaward/ this Open Source Software Award] or [https://www.inria.fr/en/2019-inria-french-academy-sciences-dassault-systemes-innovation-prize-scikit-learn-success-story this price for innovation].

- Update the Version history section and add more recent developments and features as per the [https://scikit-learn.org/stable/auto_examples/release_highlights/index.html release highlights].

- Maybe add how scikit-learn compares with other libraries at least on some high-level metrics, e.g. using the information in the [https://www.kaggle.com/kaggle-survey-2021 2021] and [https://www.kaggle.com/kaggle-survey-2022 2022] kaggle surveys [[User:ArturoAmorQ|ArturoAmorQ]] ([[User talk:ArturoAmorQ|talk]]) 15:04, 3 March 2025 (UTC)