Revision as of 01:09, 21 February 2025 edit Quondum (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 38,970 edits →2020s: rm now-pointless historical note "but so far they have not been adopted", since we now state when they were adopted ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:41, 3 March 2025 edit undo AltCode (talk \| contribs) 473 edits →1995: Cited source indicates that the IUPAC proposed exactly four new prefixes with the symbols "kb", "Mb", "Gb", and "Tb", NOT "Ki", "Mi", "Gi", and "Ti" Next edit →
Line 380: === 1995 === * August: The [[International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry]]'s Interdivisional Committee on Nomenclature and Symbols proposed new prefixes {{brown\|kibi}} (~~symbol~~from ~~{{brown\|Ki}}~~kilobinary), {{brown\|mebi}}, ({{brown\|Migibi}}), and {{brown\|~~gibi~~tebi}} (for powers of 1024; with the symbols of {{brown\|Gikb}}~~) and~~, {{brown\|~~tebi~~Mb}}, ({{brown\|TiGb}}), ~~etc.~~and ~~for powers of 1024~~{{brown\|Tb}}.<ref>{{cite web\|title=IUCr 1995 Report - IUPAC Interdivisional Committee on Nomenclature and Symbols (IDCNS)\|url=http://ww1.iucr.org/iucr-top/cexec/rep95/idcns.htm\|website=International Union of Crystallography}}</ref> === 1996 ===

Timeline of binary prefixes: Difference between revisions