Content deleted Content added
→Statement of the theorem: Thinking of the index as time is neither necessary nor sufficient to describe the role of the index set $T$. Tag: Reverted |
Undid revision 1279977118 by 128.237.82.86 (talk) |
||
Line 6:
==Statement of the theorem==
Let <math>T</math> denote some [[Interval (mathematics)|interval]] (thought of as "[[time]]"), and let <math>n \in \mathbb{N}</math>. For each <math>k \in \mathbb{N}</math> and finite [[sequence]] of distinct times <math>t_{1}, \dots, t_{k} \in T</math>, let <math>\nu_{t_{1} \dots t_{k}}</math> be a [[probability measure]] on <math>(\mathbb{R}^{n})^{k}.</math> Suppose that these measures satisfy two consistency conditions:
1. for all [[permutation]]s <math>\pi</math> of <math>\{ 1, \dots, k \}</math> and measurable sets <math>F_{i} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{n}</math>,
| |||