Content deleted Content added
SafariScribe (talk | contribs) Notification: Your Articles for Creation submission has been declined (AFCH) |
|||
Line 182:
<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:SafariScribe|Safari Scribe]]</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/SafariScribe|'''''Edits!''''']] [[User talk:SafariScribe|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 11:40, 17 March 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->
:What do you think is wrong with the existing non-Vanguard sources? Of course there are two non-independent sources too (the ones by Vanguard, owned by Seddon, who coined the concept), but there are three academic sources and one UK government one cited that are all specifically about failure demand and (so far as I can see) independent of Seddon. Is your concern that these four sources are in some sense not "secondary"? (I'm not really sure how to apply the concept of primary vs secondary here; I'm not sure if the distinction even makes sense in this context.) What sort of alternative sources would you like to see? [[User:ExplodingCabbage|ExplodingCabbage]] ([[User talk:ExplodingCabbage#top|talk]]) 13:30, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
| |||