Multiple-scale analysis: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1280810603 by Dstrozzi (talk) That cannot be the case: Dropping q^4 from the Hamiltonian would make the problem linear, independent of epsilon
Line 13:
<math display="block">\frac{dp}{dt}=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial q}, \qquad \frac{dq}{dt}=+\frac{\partial H}{\partial p}, \quad \text{ with } \quad H = \tfrac12 p^2 + \tfrac12 q^2 + \tfrac14 \varepsilon q^4,</math>
with ''q''&nbsp;=&nbsp;''y''(''t'') and ''p''&nbsp;=&nbsp;''dy''/''dt''. Consequently, the Hamiltonian ''H''(''p'',&nbsp;''q'') is a conserved quantity, a constant, equal to ''H''&nbsp;=&nbsp;{{sfrac|1|2}}&nbsp;+&nbsp;{{sfrac|1|4}}&nbsp;''ε'' for the given [[initial conditions]]. This implies that both ''y'' and ''dy''/''dt'' have to be bounded:
<math display="block">\left| y(t) \right| \le \sqrt{1 + \tfrac12 \varepsilon} \quad \text{ and } \quad \left| \frac{dy}{dt} \right| \le \sqrt{1 + \tfrac12 \varepsilon} \qquad \text{ for all } t.</math>The bound on <math>y</math> was found by dropping the <math>q^4</math> term from <math>H</math>. Including it gives a lower but more complicated bound.
 
===Straightforward perturbation-series solution===