Content deleted Content added
Largoplazo (talk | contribs) →Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2025: Not done, not an RS |
|||
Line 49:
The "use strict" feature in newer instances of JS is a straight forward copy from Perl. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:FBC:E1C4:5A7E:952E:5756:15EC:39D|2A00:FBC:E1C4:5A7E:952E:5756:15EC:39D]] ([[User talk:2A00:FBC:E1C4:5A7E:952E:5756:15EC:39D|talk]]) 14:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
:{{Not done}}: please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:EEp --> Where you write "links to source''s''", do you mean the ''one'' link you included in the section you created just above? That's one person's blog, unfortunately, which doesn't qualify as a reliable source. Can you supplied at least one? Aside from that, I'm looking at where AWK, Self, and HyperTalk are listed and thinking that if they're truly a source they ought to be mentioned as such in the article's body, but they aren't. [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 15:03, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
::This image from the Chinese blog entry mentioned in the other blog shows a grep in the original code base of JS mentioning Perl
::https://images0.cnblogs.com/blog/116671/201302/06202428-4fa9b726d88d4a16be4ac498a60f9a95.jpg
::What could be more obvious?
::I will add more sources later, because my mobile Chrome keeps erasing the form whenever I change the tab searching for more...
::I can start a detailed discussion at a programmers forum detailing the deep influence of Perl if this is considered "reliable" [[Special:Contributions/2A00:FBC:E1C4:5A7E:952E:5756:15EC:39D|2A00:FBC:E1C4:5A7E:952E:5756:15EC:39D]] ([[User talk:2A00:FBC:E1C4:5A7E:952E:5756:15EC:39D|talk]]) 16:16, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
| |||