Revision as of 20:52, 5 April 2024 edit Jasper Deng (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 54,495 edits m →diagonal = contradiction ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:43, 3 April 2025 edit undo 2a02:8109:40b:ef00:d9bc:2cde:be30:15e8 (talk) →Simple proof that this is bullshit: new section Tag: New topic Next edit →
Line 1,340: :::::::::Just so we're clear, [[User:Phyti\|Phyti]], you're [[preaching to the choir]] here: whatever you write here will do nothing to get your argument accepted or taken seriously by the mathematics community, and "[[I'm entitled to my opinion]]" is not an argument. Please also read [[WP:FREESPEECH]], [[WP:SOAPBOX]], and [[WP:NOR]].--[[User:Jasper Deng\|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng\|(talk)]] 20:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [[Category:Wikipedia mathematical arguments]] == Simple proof that this is bullshit == When you put the numbers from 0 to (exclusively) 1 on the right, but read them from right to left, what do you see? They become the natural numbers! But according to Cantor's argument this means that the set of natural numbers must be bigger than itself! [[Special:Contributions/2A02:8109:40B:EF00:D9BC:2CDE:BE30:15E8\|2A02:8109:40B:EF00:D9BC:2CDE:BE30:15E8]] ([[User talk:2A02:8109:40B:EF00:D9BC:2CDE:BE30:15E8\|talk]]) 07:43, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Talk:Cantor's diagonal argument/Arguments: Difference between revisions