Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Talk:Procedural programming) (bot |
manually archive unsigned comment, add unsigned notice to it |
||
Line 46:
The resource spend and speed are clear, also you can see a tendency.
--[[User:Magallanes|Magallanes]] 14:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
== Comparison with object-oriented programming ==
I would like to see less of the editorial slant in favor of OOP in that topic.
For example,
instead of using phrases like "it's undeniable that OOP is better at"
please use phrases like "Many people believe that OOP is better at".
Also, I would like to see some more information about how procedural programming
can be superior to OOP. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.8.163.210|24.8.163.210]] ([[User talk:24.8.163.210#top|talk]]) 13:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)</small>
== C# and Java as Procedural Languages ==
|