Content deleted Content added
→Big ole whitelist request: implemented |
→"n.d.a" vs. "n.d. a": new section |
||
Line 164:
 <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 22:05, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
== "n.d.a" vs. "n.d. a" ==
At [[Capri-Sun]], I have two references that I'd written as <code><nowiki>{{harvnb|Capri Sun Group|n.d. a}}</nowiki></code> and <code><nowiki>{{harvnb|Capri Sun Group|n.d. b}}</nowiki></code>. I could've sworn they worked as intended when they were added, but maybe I just overlooked this before, because I don't spot anything relevant in the history. Either way, as it stands, these render as "[[Capri-Sun#CITEREFCapri Sun Groupn.d. a|Capri Sun Group & n.d. a]]" and ""[[Capri-Sun#CITEREFCapri Sun Groupn.d. b|Capri Sun Group & n.d. b]]", which appears to be because [[Module:Footnotes#L-131|L131]] is expecting no space before the disambiguating letter. But I don't think most people would write "n.d.a", which looks like the ''a'' is part of an acronym. "n.d. a" is much clearer. I would suggest that both should be allowed, as should "nd a" in contrast to "nda". I believe all we'd have to do is add a <code> ?</code> before the <code>%l</code> on lines 65, 66, 131, and 132. <span style="font-family:courier"> -- [[User:Tamzin|<span style="color:#E6007A">Tamzin</span>]]</span><sup class="nowrap">[[[User talk:Tamzin|<i style="color:#E6007A">cetacean needed</i>]]]</sup> <small>([[User:Tamzin/🤷|they|xe|🤷]])</small> 03:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
| |||