Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding sheep: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
MartinDK (talk | contribs)
MartinDK (talk | contribs)
Line 6:
 
*'''Keep''' - as someone said at the time of the last AfD, "I'm going to regret this later!" I think a references tag should have been apllied first so that one of the game enthusiasts could have addressed the needs brought up in the nomination. There's enough of a trend to suggest this is not trivia. Rgds, --[[User:Trident13|Trident13]] 21:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
**'''Comment''' This article has existed in its current formversion for 3 years. During those 3 years the only reference that has been added is a link to a fansite that asserts no notability. [[WP:N]] and [[WP:RS]] are pretty clear on what makes a reliable source and how notability is asserted. In a situation like this a references tag is just a way to avoid AfD. I think we all know deep down that no one is going to add any references because you tag it. The backlog of unsourced articles is huge already. If sources are indeed available then there are 5 days to add them and the AfD template on the article is pretty hard to miss. [[User:MartinDK|MartinDK]] 21:59, 5 May 2007 (UTC)