Content deleted Content added
Assessment: banner shell (Rater) |
m indent |
||
Line 9:
Much of the grammar on this page is very poor. It shows good technical knowledge, but was clearly written by a non-native speaker. [[User:TV4Fun|TV4Fun]] ([[User talk:TV4Fun|talk]]) 03:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
:Second the comment above, on top of that the article needs some serious fact checking as well, there are number of things that I could dispute (mostly context-less generalizations).▼
:"The access time to memory that acts as a bottleneck for the CPU core performance can be relaxed by using a hierarchical cache structure in order to reduce the latency and hence speed up the CPU clock.[1]"▼
▲Second the comment above, on top of that the article needs some serious fact checking as well, there are number of things that I could dispute (mostly context-less generalizations).
:Not only this has some serious "engrish" problems, I could argue that both sides of the implication are inaccurate (and while [1] ain't any peer reviewed and approved source, technically it doesn't say it either). Never mind that most people won't understand the meaning of terms like "relaxing"/"bottleneck" even means in the context. Semantics aside, the whole sentence is just plain BS, especially the part about speeding up the CPU clock (obvious BS) + it doesn't account for concepts like pipelining and fact that there are multiple stages of what is generalized here as "memory access". ▼
▲"The access time to memory that acts as a bottleneck for the CPU core performance can be relaxed by using a hierarchical cache structure in order to reduce the latency and hence speed up the CPU clock.[1]"
:There are whole lot more of these in the text, perhaps somebody with wiki account should suggest this for deleting or something. --[[Special:Contributions/86.49.254.166|86.49.254.166]] ([[User talk:86.49.254.166|talk]]) 23:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)▼
::I concur completely, noticed this on first read of the article [[User:Rejewskifan|Rejewskifan]] ([[User talk:Rejewskifan|talk]]) 23:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)▼
▲Not only this has some serious "engrish" problems, I could argue that both sides of the implication are inaccurate (and while [1] ain't any peer reviewed and approved source, technically it doesn't say it either). Never mind that most people won't understand the meaning of terms like "relaxing"/"bottleneck" even means in the context. Semantics aside, the whole sentence is just plain BS, especially the part about speeding up the CPU clock (obvious BS) + it doesn't account for concepts like pipelining and fact that there are multiple stages of what is generalized here as "memory access".
▲There are whole lot more of these in the text, perhaps somebody with wiki account should suggest this for deleting or something. --[[Special:Contributions/86.49.254.166|86.49.254.166]] ([[User talk:86.49.254.166|talk]]) 23:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
▲:I concur completely, noticed this on first read of the article [[User:Rejewskifan|Rejewskifan]] ([[User talk:Rejewskifan|talk]]) 23:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
== Confusion between higher and lower level ==
| |||