Revision as of 21:26, 22 April 2025 edit Trovatore (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 39,125 edits →RfC on redirect, disambig, article, or deletion: maybe this heading is more neutral ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:38, 22 April 2025 edit undo Trovatore (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 39,125 edits →Discussion: notifications Next edit →
Line 102: * Option '''A'''. This is clearly the intended meaning in scholarly uses of the term. Some argue that this is an error, on the basis that a CDF is not a density function. It is true that a CDF is not a density function, but English is not so tidy that a cumulative density function needs to be a density function. This is a well-attested usage and I am uncomfortable calling it an error in WikiVoice, though I would not intentionally use it myself. --[[User:Trovatore\|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore\|talk]]) 21:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC) ===Discussion=== * '''Procedural comment'''. I believe I have notified everyone who participated in either the discussion above or the AfD, but if I missed anyone, please let me know. --[[User:Trovatore\|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore\|talk]]) 21:38, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Talk:Cumulative density function: Difference between revisions