Content deleted Content added
→Survey: option A but conditional on hatnote |
|||
Line 108:
*Option '''A'''. (invited here by the RfC bot) Being cumulative, it isn't a PDF, so we don't need to clarify that.---'''[[User:Avatar317|<span style="background:#8A2BE2; color:white; padding:2px;">Avatar317</span>]][[User talk:Avatar317|<sup><span style="background:#7B68EE; color:white; padding:2px;">(talk)</span></sup>]]''' 23:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
*{{sbb}} Option '''A''' and hatnote to option B per David's comments above. [[User:SmittenGalaxy|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:#663399; text-shadow:3px 3px 5px #dda0dd">SmittenGalaxy</span>]] <span style="font-weight:bold">|</span> [[User_talk:SmittenGalaxy|<span style="font-style:italic; color:#000080">talk!</span>]] 07:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
* '''Hatnote''' at Cumulative distribution function pointing to probability density function, and option '''A'''. The current (helpful!) disambig doesn't lecture the reader; the only complaint that can be levelled against it is that it falls foul of [[WP:2DABS]], and the 2DABS argument is that if there are only two targets, they ''should'' be dealt with by hat-notes instead, so merely redirecting without a hat-note is a very poor choice. Most readers may be looking for CDF, but we shouldn't make personal assumptions or ignore the minority who were aiming for PDF. [[User:Elemimele|Elemimele]] ([[User talk:Elemimele|talk]]) 12:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
===Discussion===
| |||