Talk:Objections to evolution: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Restored revision 1259721835 by Sahaib (talk): WP:NOTAFORUM, not a WP:SOAPBOX
Article review: new section
Line 147:
:{{talk quote|a fact isn't something that you "support", it would be like saying "supporters of gravity" or "supporters of The Holocaust", it doesn't make much sense, does it?.}}
:Sure you can. I think it's fine in this context and doesn't really have the effect you describe. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 01:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 
== Article review ==
 
It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and saw lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs and at the end of paragraphs. Should this article go to [[WP:GAR]]? [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 15:23, 24 April 2025 (UTC)