Content deleted Content added
→April 2025: Reply |
|||
Line 131:
**Thanks. Yes, the plan was to link to the yearbooks as sources after I got all the information up to 2012. Apologies for not doing so during the process... However, I see someone else deleted the amendments entirely without even a courtesy message. Regardless, I will just put the information up on the school website in a history section since it appears too much of our history isn't considered relevant for Wikipedia and yearbooks aren't acceptable sources. [[User:Coderoyal|Coderoyal]] ([[User talk:Coderoyal#top|talk]]) 15:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
***I did that, and I explained why--and that's a good opportunity for me to tell you that it is courteous to leave edit summaries explaining what you are doing. Yes, yearbooks aren't acceptable: they are not independent secondary sources, I'm afraid. Parts of what you put in there might well be encyclopedically relevant (buildings, moves, etc.) but you'll have the sources for it: newspapers, most likely, and possibly books. Good luck, [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:41, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
***:No worries. I appreciate that you gave feedback on the issues at hand instead of a silent deletion. What I will do for now is put the information on a school website, and later one, someone can source approvable information from the history page onto the wiki site. It won't be a problem for us. Best wishes. Alan [[User:Coderoyal|Coderoyal]] ([[User talk:Coderoyal#top|talk]]) 18:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
| |||