Revision as of 05:28, 6 May 2025 edit Michael Hardy (talk \| contribs) Administrators 210,596 edits →Survey ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:41, 6 May 2025 edit undo Trovatore (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 39,125 edits →Survey: r Next edit →
Line 115: * Option '''A''': Someone looking for a "cumulative density function" is clearly looking for something cumulative, or they wouldn't have included an extra word to express that. No hatnote seems necessary to me; it seems like just a misnomer but not really unclear. (It also doesn't seem common, so not worth the clutter.) —⁠ ⁠[[User:BarrelProof\|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof\|talk]]) 17:07, 29 April 2025 (UTC) * David Eppstein wrote: "If there are only two topics to disambiguate and one of them is primary" etc. I don't think that rule was intended for cases where the title of the article is a complete misnomer and oxymoron, like "cumulative density function." [[User:Michael Hardy\|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy\|talk]]) 05:28, 6 May 2025 (UTC) ** '''Comment''' it is not clear to me that it is a complete misnomer and oxymoron. I agree that it's a poorer choice of terminology than "cumulative distribution function", but as I said above, I do not agree with calling it an error in Wikivoice, unless reliable secondary sources specifically making that exact claim can be found. --[[User:Trovatore\|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore\|talk]]) 05:41, 6 May 2025 (UTC) ===Discussion===

Talk:Cumulative density function: Difference between revisions