Content deleted Content added
→INCOMPLETE EXAMPLE: Reply |
→compression?: Reply |
||
Line 240:
</blockquote>
Technically, BWT is not a '''compression'''. Should it be noted? It leads to wrong understanding of the subject —[[User:Metalim|lim]] 16:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
:I agree that this is confusing. What's more, it doesn't seem that this illogical terminology is actually used in the field; it's a confusion specific to this Wikipedia article. "Block-sorting compression" or "Block Sorting Lossless Data Compression Algorithm" refers to a compression algorithm of which the BWT is ''one of several steps'' (albeit the only one that was a novel new idea when BSLDCA was published); it's ''not'' synonymous with BWT as we claim here.
:It makes sense for these compression-related terms to be bolded in the article and to redirect to it, especially since the original paper by Burrows and Wheeler was literally titled "A Block-sorting Lossless Data Compression Algorithm" - but we shouldn't conflate that compression algorithm with what people now call BWT, which is just the reordering of characters without any actual compression step.
:I'll have a go at fixing it. [[User:ExplodingCabbage|ExplodingCabbage]] ([[User talk:ExplodingCabbage|talk]]) 09:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
== Bad inefficiency in the example implementation ==
|