Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Header: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→top: tweak this wording, easily misread as saying no third-parties may comment; cf. Special:Permalink/1283178308#WP:AE |
Closetside (talk | contribs) Redirect vexatious to vexbysterang; the term for bad commenters |
||
Line 15:
For all other problems, including content disagreements or the enforcement of community-imposed sanctions, please use the other fora described in the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution process]]. To appeal Arbitration Committee decisions, please use [[WP:ARCA|the clarification and amendment noticeboard]].
'''Only [[WP:autoconfirmed|autoconfirmed]] users may file enforcement requests here'''; requests filed by IPs or accounts less than four days old or with fewer than 10 edits will be removed. All users are welcome to comment on requests except where doing so would violate an active restriction (such as an [[WP:ECR|extended-confirmed restriction]]). If you make an enforcement request or comment on a request, your own conduct may be examined as well, and you may be sanctioned for it. '''Enforcement requests and statements in response to them may not exceed ''500 words and 20 diffs''''', except by permission of a reviewing administrator. [http://wordcounttools.com/ (Word Count Tool)] Statements must be made in separate sections. Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators. Disruptive contributions such as [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]], or groundless or [[WP:VEXBYSTERANG|vexatious]] complaints, may result in blocks or other sanctions.
[[File:Symbol information vote.svg|frameless|15px|link=|alt=]] {{emu|'''The scope of a discussion is limited to the conduct of two parties''': the filer and the user being reported.}} If additional editors are to be reported, separate AE reports must be opened for each. AE admins may waive this rule if the particular issue warrants doing so.
| |||