Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
fix ref; combine refs; |
||
Line 119:
and the new variables are linearly related as: <math>q = \alpha p</math>.
To find the optimal linear relationship, we minimize the total squared reconstruction error:
<math>E(\alpha) = \frac{1}{1 - \alpha^2} \sum_{i=1}^{n} (\alpha p_i - q_i)^2</math>; such that setting the derivative of the error function to zero <math>(E'(\alpha) = 0)</math> yields:<math>\alpha = \frac{1}{2} \left( -\lambda \pm \sqrt{\lambda^2 + 4} \right)</math> where<math>\lambda = \frac{p \cdot p - q \cdot q}{p \cdot q}</math>.
[[File:PCA of Haplogroup J using 37 STRs.png|thumb|right|A principal components analysis scatterplot of [[Y-STR]] [[haplotype]]s calculated from repeat-count values for 37 Y-chromosomal STR markers from 354 individuals.<br /> PCA has successfully found linear combinations of the markers that separate out different clusters corresponding to different lines of individuals' Y-chromosomal genetic descent.]]
Line 158:
:<math>\mathbf{T}_L = \mathbf{U}_L\mathbf{\Sigma}_L = \mathbf{X} \mathbf{W}_L </math>
The truncation of a matrix '''M''' or '''T''' using a truncated singular value decomposition in this way produces a truncated matrix that is the nearest possible matrix of [[Rank (linear algebra)|rank]] ''L'' to the original matrix, in the sense of the difference between the two having the smallest possible [[Frobenius norm]], a result known as the [[Low-rank approximation#Proof of Eckart–Young–Mirsky theorem (for Frobenius norm)|Eckart–Young theorem]] [1936].
<blockquote>
Line 168 ⟶ 167:
where V<sub>k</sub> consists of the first k columns of V. Moreover, the relative residual variance is
<math>R(k)=\frac{\sum_{j=k+1}^{m}\sigma_{j}^{2}}{\sum_{j=1}^{m}\sigma_{j}^{2}}</math>.
</blockquote><ref name="Holmes2023" />
== Further considerations ==
Line 211 ⟶ 198:
If we have just two variables and they have the same [[sample variance]] and are completely correlated, then the PCA will entail a rotation by 45° and the "weights" (they are the cosines of rotation) for the two variables with respect to the principal component will be equal. But if we multiply all values of the first variable by 100, then the first principal component will be almost the same as that variable, with a small contribution from the other variable, whereas the second component will be almost aligned with the second original variable. This means that whenever the different variables have different units (like temperature and mass), PCA is a somewhat arbitrary method of analysis. (Different results would be obtained if one used Fahrenheit rather than Celsius for example.) Pearson's original paper was entitled "On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Points in Space" – "in space" implies physical Euclidean space where such concerns do not arise. One way of making the PCA less arbitrary is to use variables scaled so as to have unit variance, by standardizing the data and hence use the autocorrelation matrix instead of the autocovariance matrix as a basis for PCA. However, this compresses (or expands) the fluctuations in all dimensions of the signal space to unit variance.
Classical PCA assumes the cloud of points has already been translated so its centroid is at the origin.<ref name="Holmes2023" />
| |||