Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTP payload formats: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 9:
*:*'''Delete''' I agree this is acting primarily as a directory for something that is highly technical in nature. The existence of various payloads is already noted in the main RTP article. Users interested in more detail can find these sorts of listings from there. [[User:Anonrfjwhuikdzz|Anonrfjwhuikdzz]] ([[User talk:Anonrfjwhuikdzz|talk]]) 01:26, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to [[Real-time Transport Protocol#Profiles and payload formats]]. [[User:MarioGom|MarioGom]] ([[User talk:MarioGom|talk]]) 14:03, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
*'''Rename''' to ''List of RTP payload formats''.
::I agree with [[User:Pppery]] that this article is sort of a list, but disagree that this is inappropriate. The table that constitues the bulk of the article gives context and explanation, refuting the argument on directories and catalogs. Instead, it describes a notable subject: the fact that there exist plethora of RTP payloads. It serves as a stepping stone for further investigation and research for those with further interest.
::I also disagree with [[User:MarioGom]] that a redirect should suffice and with [[User:Wcquidditch]] that the existence is sufficiently described in the main article. The referenced section only briefly summarises the large number of different formats.— [[User:Dandorid|<i><sub><u>D</u></sub><sup><b>a</b></sup><small>n</small><sub><u>d</u></sub><sup><b>o</b></sup><small>r</small><sup><b>i</b></sup><sub><u>D</u></sub></i>]] ([[User Talk:Dandorid|talk]]) 06:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)