Content deleted Content added
JoNeedsSleep (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 96:
::::::::The article is well-written. I made [[Special:Diff/1290020387|some]] modifications. It would benefit though from having more sources from reliable news outlets or peer-reviewed journals, Wikipedia is pretty strict on which sources are [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|considered reliable]].
::::::::For the redirect, are you sure you don't want the redirect to point to the article on mechanistic interpretability? I know mechanistic interpretability is more narrow than interpretability, but I suppose that's what people are interested in most of the time when they search for "Interpretability". [[User:Alenoach|Alenoach]] ([[User talk:Alenoach|talk]]) 09:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::Thanks for the feedback, really appreciate it. I am not opposed to redirecting interp to mech interp. XAI is definitely not what people are looking for when they search interp and that interp section is way too brief, though my main concern is that I described mech interp more in its precise sense, and there’s non-“mechanistic” interpretability especially in various disconnected parts of academia. I do plan to incorporate more history of mech interp in academia in my next revision. Would you recommend I expand the scope of this article in my next revisiob? [[User:JoNeedsSleep|JoNeedsSleep]] ([[User talk:JoNeedsSleep|talk]]) 15:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
| |||