Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modular agile transit: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Modular agile transit: @Omphalographer "Yes, I was thinking the same for this au..." [Factotum] |
My response. |
||
Line 12:
*:The faulty citations are characteristic of LLM output. With that in mind, I have to wonder if the rest of the article is LLM-generated as well. [[User:Omphalographer|Omphalographer]] ([[User talk:Omphalographer|talk]]) 01:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
*::Yes, I was thinking the same for this author's [[Repast (funeral)]], which I also AFDed.<span id="Reywas92:1747664917200:WikipediaFTTCLNArticles_for_deletion/Modular_agile_transit" class="FTTCmt"> [[User:Reywas92|Reywas92]]<sup>[[User talk:Reywas92|Talk]]</sup> 14:28, 19 May 2025 (UTC)</span>
* '''Keep''' – As the article’s primary author, I appreciate the feedback in this AfD and have significantly revised the article to address the raised concerns. The original version was overly complex and included some irrelevant sources, which I acknowledge made it read like a promotional piece. I have rewritten it into a concise Start-class article, focusing only on the core concept of modular transit supported by two peer-reviewed sources directly discussing the topic. These sources establish notability per [[WP:GNG]] by providing significant coverage of modular transit systems in reputable journals (Transportation Research Parts C and A). I've removed unsourced claims, bullet points, and promotional language to comply with [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:MOS]] and clarified that MAT is a research concept, not a product, addressing concerns about its "evolving notion" status. While not a deployed system, the concept’s coverage in academic literature makes it encyclopedic, similar to other research-stage transport concepts like [[Hyperloop]]. I'm open to further suggestions for improvement. [[User:Whoisjohngalt|Whoisjohngalt]] ([[User talk:Whoisjohngalt|talk]]) 16:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
| |||