Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTP payload formats: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Keep or rename |
Re |
||
Line 29:
::This illustrates my point. {{tq|Similar summary information seems to be available through IANA}} would be great to have, but I doubt it actually exists, [[User:Ramos1990| Ramos1990]]. I believe this article summarises the wealth of options, in a way that a picture tells more than a thousand words. If you would summarise this page somewhere in a section of [[Real-time transport protocol]] you would need more than a thousand words to do the summary right.— [[User:Dandorid|<i><sub><u>D</u></sub><sup><b>a</b></sup><small>n</small><sub><u>d</u></sub><sup><b>o</b></sup><small>r</small><sup><b>i</b></sup><sub><u>D</u></sub></i>]] ([[User Talk:Dandorid|talk]]) 07:37, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
:*So '''Keep''' or '''Rename'''. There is a dynamic that some fail to see here: Wikipedia is a ''primary'' source of information to many people. A sort of low information [[entropy]]: a concentration, a density, brought together by people that felt a certain need to do so. Destroying a page like this increases information entropy, which leaves you with a greater burden of finding the information (which undoubtedly exists in many places) yourself, and you only get it in bits and pieces. Most likely, somebody will recreate this page somewhere in the future, for the same reasons [[User:Sergeymasushko]] had when creating [[RTP payload formats]]. — [[User:Dandorid|<i><sub><u>D</u></sub><sup><b>a</b></sup><small>n</small><sub><u>d</u></sub><sup><b>o</b></sup><small>r</small><sup><b>i</b></sup><sub><u>D</u></sub></i>]] ([[User Talk:Dandorid|talk]]) 07:37, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
:*: This is an utterly meaningless argument - by this logic one should never delete anything. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 14:02, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
| |||