Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTP payload formats: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→RTP payload formats: Reply |
→RTP payload formats: Reply |
||
Line 31:
:*: This is an utterly meaningless argument - by this logic one should never delete anything. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 14:02, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
:*::Well, that is the main idea of [[WP:Inclusionism]] on Wikipedia, and I support inclusionism. After all, [[WP:Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia]], and we already have Britannica, which is generally more reliable than Wikipedia (see [[WP:CW]]), and only chooses the ''most'' notable topics. I think the advantage of Wikipedia is that it covers more niche topics compared to a traditional encyclopedia such as Britannica, which is why I'm an inclusionist. I usually read Britannica to get a broad overview of more popular topics, and I use Wikipedia for more niche topics like computing (this article) and railways. [[User:Félix An|Félix An]] ([[User talk:Félix An|talk]]) 09:20, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
:*::If none of my arguments make any sense whatsoever (I guess that is what you mean by {{tq|utterly meaningless}}) then, by your logic, you should delete all articles and do away with Wikipedia altogether. — [[User:Dandorid|<i><sub><u>D</u></sub><sup><b>a</b></sup><small>n</small><sub><u>d</u></sub><sup><b>o</b></sup><small>r</small><sup><b>i</b></sup><sub><u>D</u></sub></i>]] ([[User Talk:Dandorid|talk]]) 07:00, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
| |||