Library classification: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
English language universal classification systems: Ranganathan's Colon is historically significant, but has very little adoption outside India, and even there, it is now being phased out in favor of systems like DDC, UDC, and LCC
OAbot (talk | contribs)
m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot.
Line 82:
 
Other systems include:
* [[BISAC Subject Headings|Book Industry Standards and Communications]] (BISAC), originally developed for use by U.S. booksellers, has become increasingly popular in libraries.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Martínez-Ávila |first=Daniel |date=2016 |title=BISAC: Book Industry Standards and Communications |url=https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/index.php?doi=10.5771/0943-7444-2016-8-655 |journal=Knowledge Organization |volume=43 |issue=8 |pages=655–662 |doi=10.5771/0943-7444-2016-8-655 |issn=0943-7444|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
* [[Bliss bibliographic classification]] used in some British libraries
* [[Colon classification]] (CC)