Wikipedia:Categorization: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Diffusing large categories: "possible" = yes it is technically possible, but that's not what we mean here - we mean it is permissible (by guidelines and policies) Tag: Reverted |
→Diffusing large categories: the template we tell readers to use to "diffuse" categories doesn't use that term itself! Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 284:
===Diffusing large categories===
{{Shortcut|WP:DIFFUSE}}{{redirect|WP:DIFFUSE|conflicts|Wikipedia:Diffusing conflict}}
Although there is no limit on the size of categories, a large category will often be broken down ("diffused" or "subcategorized") into smaller, more specific subcategories. For example, [[:Category:Rivers of Europe]] contains no articles about specific rivers directly; they are all in subcategories.
{{anchor|Metacategories|META}}A category may be diffused using several coexisting schemes; for example, [[:Category:Albums]] is broken down by artist, by date, by genre etc. '''Metacategories''' may be created as ways of organizing schemes of subcategories. For example, the subcategories called "''Artistname'' albums" are not placed directly into [[:Category:Albums]], but into the metacategory [[:Category:Albums by artist]], which itself appears in Category:Albums. (See [[:Category:Categories by parameter]])
Line 292:
Information about how a category is diffused may be given on the category page. Categories which are intended to be fully broken down into subcategories can be marked with the {{tl|category diffuse}} template, which indicates that any pages which editors might add to the main category should be moved to the appropriate subcategories when sufficient information is available. (If the proper subcategory for an article does not exist yet, either create the subcategory or leave the article in the parent category for the time being.)
To suggest that a category is so large that it ought to be
{{anchor|NON-DIFFUSE|NONDIFFUSE|ALLINCLUDED|DUPCAT}}
| |||