Behavior tree: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:14, 4 June 2025

Revision as of 21:17, 4 June 2025

Line 127:

=== Large-scale systems ===

Modeling large-scale systems with large sets of natural-language requirements has always been the major focus for testing behavior trees and the overall behavior engineering process. Conducting these evaluations and trials of the method has involved work with a number of industry partners and government departments in Australia. The systems studied have included a significant number of defense systems, enterprise systems, transportation systems, information systems, health systems, and sophisticated control systems with stringent safety requirements. The results of these studies have all been commercial-in-confidence. However, the results of the extensive industry trails<ref name = "raytheonSysResearch" /><ref name = "raytheonAustJoint" /> with [[Raytheon]] Australia are presented below in the Industry Section. This work has consistently shown that translating requirements andinto creatingintegrated dynamicstatic and staticdynamic integratedbehavior-tree views ofrevealed requirements leads to discovery of a very significant numbersubstantially ofmore major defects, over and abovethan the defectscompany’s thatstandard arereview foundprocesses by current industry best-practicedetected.<ref name = "industryTrialsPaper" />

=== Embedded systems ===