Module talk:WikiProject banner: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Module talk:WikiProject banner/Archive 16) (bot
Line 82:
:::::::::Sorry, I couldn't see the link through the noise here. I see two of the same color light-green (#DFFFBF) background, as I would expect after I changed the magnifying-glass cell to use class-b with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Module%3AWikiProject_banner%2Fauxiliary&diff=1288445529&oldid=1272930615 this edit]. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 14:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::Ah, okay I hadn't noticed that edit. So everything makes sense then! &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 06:09, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
 
== WikiProject Higher education ==
 
I don't know if people are aware of the changes to [[Template:WikiProject Higher education]] which is now using a bespoke module to achieve some unusual behaviour (discussion [[Template talk:WikiProject Higher education#Lua-enabled version of template to accommodate task forces for individual universities|here]] and [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Higher education#Ongoing proposal - merge inactive higher education Wikiprojects|here]]). The change allows editors to specify task forces by using a comma-separated list, i.e. {{para|taskforce|cuny,uva}} instead of the more usual method of {{para|cuny|yes}} and {{para|uva|yes}}.
 
The problem is that some features are not working (e.g. unknown parameter checking) and it is permanantly in [[:Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell needing attention]]. So I was wondering if there is a better way to do this, or whether we should look at coding something similar more widely for other projects to use. &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 12:27, 5 June 2025 (UTC)