Content deleted Content added
→copy pasted article contents: Updated comment |
→Nova Trex/Wang: new section |
||
Line 700:
:Examples with an issue, can be easily rewritten to be within the policy ([[WP:PRESERVE]]). Portions were redone and statements above them are all referenced, where on many other programming language articles, they do not go that extra step with providing references with their examples. [[User:Wukuendo|Wukuendo]] ([[User talk:Wukuendo|talk]]) 15:33, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
== Nova Trex/Wang ==
A discussion at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&curid=11424955&diff=1299302587&oldid=1299300040#Independent_Laboratory_and_Wang_Publishers reliable sources] concludes that the lack of information about Wang publisher, the total blackout on author Nova Trex, and the odd flood of books ({{tq|During the week of December 20 to December 26 of 2024, Nova Trex released 18 books}}) that these books cannot be considered reliable sources. That includes the V programming book used here. The discussion did not come to a conclusion about Independent Laboratory other than no information was available for this author/publisher. It being in Japan means that we probably need someone who can navigate better in that language.
This is in addition to other sources that are problematic, as noted above. Removing these cannot degrade the article because it is their presence that is degrading the article. [[User:Lamona|Lamona]] ([[User talk:Lamona|talk]]) 16:57, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
| |||