Model transformation language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:27, 19 November 2024

Latest revision as of 14:46, 13 July 2025

Line 8:

Currently, most model transformation languages are being developed in academia. The [[Object Management Group|OMG]] has standardised a family of model transformation languages called [[QVT]], but the field is still immature.<ref name="FranceRumpe"/>

There are ongoing debates regarding the benefits of specialised model transformation languages, compared to the use of general-purpose programming languages (GPLs) such as [[Java (programming language)|Java]].<ref>{{Cite web| title=The Future of Model Transformation Languages: An Open Community Discussion | url=https://www.jot.fm/issues/issue_2019_03/article7.pdf {{Bare| URLarchive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200215140328/http://www.jot.fm/issues/issue_2019_03/article7.pdf PDF| archive-date=August 20242020-02-15}}</ref> While GPLs have advantages in terms of more widely-available practitioner knowledge and tool support, the specialised transformation languages do provide more declarative facilities and more powerful specialised features to support model transformations.<ref>{{cite journal | doi=10.1007/s10664-022-10194-7 | title=Advantages and disadvantages of (Dedicated) model transformation languages | date=2022 | last1=Höppner | first1=Stefan | last2=Haas | first2=Yves | last3=Tichy | first3=Matthias | last4=Juhnke | first4=Katharina | journal=Empirical Software Engineering | volume=27 | issue=6 | s2cid=251644010 | doi-access=free | arxiv=2201.13348 }}</ref>

== Available transformation languages ==