Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:01, 13 July 2025

Revision as of 12:01, 15 July 2025

Line 19:

<small>{{Ping|Cinderella157|Dicklyon|Sammy D III|Myceteae|Gawaon|Andy Dingley|Intothatdarkness|SchreiberBike|Hawkeye7|Blueboar|Rally Wonk|Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction|FactOrOpinion|NatGertler|Yesterday, all my dreams...|Randy Kryn|Chicdat|AjaxSmack|SMcCandlish|Kowal2701}} Pinging participants in the MOS:CAPS discussion, the RSN discussion, and those who might be interested in this RfC. I also left an rfc notice at Village Pump (policy), WikiProject English Language, WP:NCCAPS. If I forgot someone, I am terribly sorry.</small> [[User:TurboSuperA+|<small><span style="background:#000;color:#FFF;"><em><b>TurboSuperA+</b></em></span></small>]][[User talk:TurboSuperA+|_(connect)]] 13:58, 16 June 2025 (UTC)}}

'''[[Wikipedia talk:Featured article criteria#rfc_76423A4|Wikipedia talk:Featured article criteria]]'''

{{rfcquote|text=

Should understandability be added to the featured article criteria? And if so, which wording should be used?

# It should be added to the well-written criterion as

## '''well-written''': its prose is engaging, [[WP:MTAU|understandable]] to a broad audience, and of a professional standard;

## '''well-written''': its prose is engaging, [[WP:MTAU|understandable]] to its [[WP:audience|audience]], and of a professional standard;

# It should be a separate criterion: 1g. '''[[WP:MTAU|Understandable]]''' to its [[WP:audience|audience]].

# Status quo: no explicit mention

[[User:Femke|—Femke 🐦]] ([[User talk:Femke|talk]]) 11:45, 15 June 2025 (UTC)}}

{{RFC list footer|policy|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }}