Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Self-references to avoid: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Early Life and Education: Nitasha Sihag education Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
UrielAcosta (talk | contribs) Reverted hijacking for spam Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 9:
==Types of self-reference==
===''This Wikipedia article discusses ...'', ''While Wikipedia is not a ...'', ''Edit this page ...''===
{{Side box|text=
{{tick}} <big>This article discusses...</big><br/><br/>
{{cross}} <big>This Wikipedia article discusses...</big>
|style=background-color: aliceblue|metadata=no}}
Mentioning that the article is being read on Wikipedia, or referring to Wikipedia policies or technicalities of using Wikipedia, should be avoided in the article namespace where it is unnecessary. If mentioning a policy is necessary to disambiguate article titles or subtopics, [[WP:HATNOTE|hatnotes]] can serve that purpose.
These types of self-references limit the use of Wikipedia as a [[free content]] encyclopedia suitable for [[fork (software development)|forking]], as permitted by our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|licenses]]. The goal of Wikipedia is to create ''an encyclopedia'', not merely to perpetuate itself, so the articles produced should be useful, even outside the context of the project used to create them. This means that while articles may refer to themselves, they should not refer to "Wikipedia" or to the Wikipedia project as a whole (e.g. "this website"). And our readers already know this is an encyclopedia; it is not useful to insert [[Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles|content disclaimers]], e.g., "While Wikipedia is not a dictionary ..." to an article on a jargon term.
Mentioning the Wikipedia community, or website features, can confuse readers of [[Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content|derived works]]. Unless substantially part of the article topic, do not refer to the fact that the page can be edited, nor mention any Wikipedia project page or process, specialized Wikipedia jargon (e.g. "PoV" in place of "biased"), or any [[MediaWiki]] interface link in the sidebar or along the top of the screen.
References that exist in a way that assumes the reader is using an encyclopedia, without reference to the specific encyclopedia (Wikipedia) or the manner of access (online), are acceptable. For instance, in the article on the [[Kobe Bryant sexual assault case]], before the alleged victim's identification, it said that "Due to concerns over privacy, the name of the alleged victim is not being included in this article." That is a reference that makes sense on [[Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks|mirrors and forks]] and in print, and makes sense in a copy of Wikipedia that contains only the article space. Similarly, many [[Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists|list articles]] explicitly state their inclusion criteria in the lead section. The template {{tlx|printworthy selfref}} can be used to mark such passages as intentional self-references that are generally printworthy and mirror-worthy, but which some reusers may wish to suppress. Other examples of permissible self-references of this sort include [[WP:DLINKS|disambiguation link]]s (the [[:Category:Hatnote templates|templates for which]] suppress their appearance in printed copies), and "See ..." [[:Category:Cross-reference templates|cross-references]] (which may or may not be printworthy, depending upon whether they are inter-article; {{crossreference|see [[Template:Crossreference/doc]])}}.
The templates that render self-referencing messages for the maintenance needs of developing articles, such as {{tlx|stub}}, {{tlx|npov}}, and {{tlx|refimprove}}, are unavoidable (and may permissibly include things like "Edit this page ..."), but articles should normally avoid self-referencing templates such as {{tlx|shortcut}} and the others.
===''Note that ...'', ''It is important to ...'', ''What is ...?'', ''Surprisingly ...'', ''Of course ...''===
|