Revision as of 16:16, 11 May 2007 edit 143.115.155.56 (talk) ←Created page with 'Intel didn't even have a processor when Relocatable Object Module was being generated in JCL decks on early IBM's using core memory. Heck, they may be older than t...'		Revision as of 08:45, 12 May 2007 edit undo JulesH (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,584 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1: Intel didn't even have a processor when Relocatable Object Module was being generated in JCL decks on early IBM's using core memory. Heck, they may be older than that.. Any way the idea was that the ROM could be linked into a calling module - adding a base address to its relocatable address. Do the research ... {{unsigned\|143.115.155.56}} :Based on [http://groups.google.co.uk/group/bit.listserv.ibm-main/browse_frm/thread/e376a2b332ff6b77/e1ac646b8ea9cc8c?lnk=st&q=%22What%27s+the+linkage+editor+really+wants%3F%22&rnum=1&hl=en#e1ac646b8ea9cc8c this discussion] of JCL card formats for IBM systems, I'm pretty sure the format you're talking about is a different one that happened to be called by the same name. [[User:JulesH\|JulesH]] 08:45, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Object Module Format (Intel): Difference between revisions