Content deleted Content added
→problems!: mark {{Unsigned}} Special:Diff/57016014, mark {{Unsigned IP}} Special:Diff/62182393 (using Unsigned helper) |
→Desktop Use: refactor Special:Diff/133841691, which got inserted in the middle of Special:Diff/133841479+Special:Diff/133841691 |
||
Line 79:
: [[Netbeans]] for teh win! In all seriousness though, there are plenty of excellent free solutions out there, such as Netbeans and Eclipse. Without fighting over which of the free solutions is better (Netbeans would win that hands down anyway), it is redicilous to assume that (esp. without statistical evidence) a solution that costs tons of money, and is primarily meant for .NET/C++ would be the ideal of preferred development means for Java. My apologies for being anonymous btw :P
* ''There are multiple versions of the JRE, which can introduce compatibility issues for Java applications installed on a system'': this is the same with ANY other language / platform, as C#, Python, Perl, even Flash, and as Java is (for the most part) upward compatible, especially at the binary-level, I think it is not a problem ; also, I never seen this explained as a weakness of Java which could reduce its desktop adoption (except on Wikipedia..).
: Isn't this a reference to the old conflict between the Microsoft Java VM and the Sun Java VM? In that case, there really were incompatibilities. Which IMHO, was a pretty shitty thing to do on MS's part. However, the lawyers settled this and now Sun's VM is considered the "real one" and others that are developed (open source ones for example) are modelled after the Sun one, for compatibility. Especially since the vast amount of platforms on which a Java VM is supported, this seems to be a thing of the past. Just my 2 cents... <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/80.61.108.218|80.61.108.218]] ([[User talk:80.61.108.218|talk]]) 14:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->▼
* The claims seen on the net are Java memory usage, Java mostly don't follow platform GUI guidelines, extra-step to deploy Java-based apps (even if it is the same with a lot of other frameworks), and Java being non-free in the past. [[User:Hervegirod|Hervegirod]] 12:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
▲:: Isn't this a reference to the old conflict between the Microsoft Java VM and the Sun Java VM? In that case, there really were incompatibilities. Which IMHO, was a pretty shitty thing to do on MS's part. However, the lawyers settled this and now Sun's VM is considered the "real one" and others that are developed (open source ones for example) are modelled after the Sun one, for compatibility. Especially since the vast amount of platforms on which a Java VM is supported, this seems to be a thing of the past. Just my 2 cents... <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/80.61.108.218|80.61.108.218]] ([[User talk:80.61.108.218|talk]]) 14:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Don't forget the rest of the World ==
| |||