Wikipedia:Don't edit for power: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:34, 8 August 2025

Revision as of 18:35, 8 August 2025

Line 5:

== What happens when they get power ==

Let's say these power-hunting users go up for [[WP:RFARfA|RFARfA]] and succeed. They gain the supposed power that they have only edited Wikipedia for. These users will possibly now just scrap writing articles and improving them, also scrapping any other kind of encyclopedia-based work. They will use the tools and only the tools!

Eventually, they will get bored of even being on Wikipedia, bearing in mind they weren't bored when they were busy writing articles and improving everything to get the admin job. Many of these kinds of users will just [[WP:Former administrators|abandon their admin account]] — just for some hacker to compromise it 5 months later and [[WP:VAND|wreak havoc with these admin tools]]. Which is one reason you shouldn't just edit to look for power. However, under most cases that doesn't happen, and this situation is a rare one.

==What happens when they don't get power...==

Let's say an average user who is hunting for power on Wikipedia goes up for [[WP:RFARfA|RFARfA]] and fails the process. Problems can then arise. These power-hunting users may get angry that they have failed the RFARfA process, even though they may not at all be fit to be an admin. They may think Wikipedia has something against them. They may [[WP:COOL|stay cool]] – or they may explode on the users who have opposed them in the RFARfA. This can lead to months and months of trouble, resulting in them never becoming an admin anyway. This would be yet another reason why one shouldn't use Wikipedia to get power and attention.

==Are all admins looking for power then?==