Content deleted Content added
Pepelepew60 (talk | contribs) Changed it from 6-7 years old to 18-25 years Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Administration -> administration |
||
Line 252:
=== Gender ===
Selective Service bases the registration requirement on [[sex assigned at birth]], and forces binary interpretation of this, including upon [[intersex]] individuals. This is in line with a [[Executive Order 14168|presidential executive order]] denying any legal recognition of [[transgender]] individuals' [[gender identity|gender identities]], [[Gender transition|social transition]] status, and [[transgender health care|medical transition]] status, as well the legal existence of [[intersex]] individuals, which was issued by the second Trump
Prior to the second Trump
In February 2019, the male-only military draft registry was ruled to be unconstitutional by a federal district judge in ''[[National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System]]''.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://thehill.com/policy/defense/431334-judge-rules-all-male-military-draft-unconstitutional/|title=Judge rules all-male military draft unconstitutional|first=Michael|last=Burke|date=24 February 2019}}</ref> Following the ruling, Selective Service System attorney Jacob Daniels told reporters: "Things continue here at Selective Service as they have in the past, which is men between the ages of 18 and 25 are required to register with Selective Service. And at this time, until we receive guidance from either the court or from Congress, women are not required to register for Selective Service."<ref>[https://www.npr.org/2019/03/01/699514360/despite-ruling-only-men-are-being-required-to-register-for-military-drafts Despite Ruling, Only Men Are Being Required To Register For Military Drafts : NPR<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> On 13 August 2020, the federal district judge's opinion was unanimously overturned by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. The Court held that male-only military draft registration is constitutional on the basis that "only the Supreme Court may revise its precedent."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/federal-appeals-court-male-draft-constitutional-72350218|title = Federal appeals court: Male-only draft is constitutional|website = [[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]]}}</ref>
|