Revision as of 23:23, 30 April 2005 edit John Fader (talk \| contribs) 4,626 edits →Always fill the summary field: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:17, 1 May 2005 edit undo JosephBarillari (talk \| contribs) 2,339 edits →Always fill the summary field Next edit →
Line 599: : Adding code to the software to do this has been suggested several times before, but it was always rejected on the (quite reasonable) grounds that people who can't be bothered to leave a decent edit summary will just put random crap in if we force them to do something. In general, there aren't technical solutions to sociological misbehaviours. I suppose Omegatron's forgetfulness is one reasonable reason to implement this (there are technical solutions to honest mistakes), but don't expect a golden arcadia of well-written edit summaries. -- [[User:John Fader\|John Fader]] ([[User talk:John Fader\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/John Fader\|''contribs'']]) 23:23, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) : On a related note, I think I will create a Village pump (perennial proposals) section for things like this which come up often. (I suggested it a while back, too.) [[User:JosephBarillari\|jdb ❋]] ([[User_talk:JosephBarillari\|talk]]) 00:17, 1 May 2005 (UTC) == Chinese Character Wikipedia.en Area ==

Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals): Difference between revisions