Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 760:
:::::@[[User:Cacodemonwiki|Cacodemonwiki]]: I didn't say, or imply, that {{tq|"government/public institutions [are] not notable"}}. I said they are primary sources, and thus do not contribute towards notability per the relevant guideline [[WP:ORG]]. -- [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 11:19, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
:::::{{u|Cacodemonwiki}} Government institutions are not ''inherently'' notable- they are treated like any other organization. You must show that it meets [[WP:ORG]]. It doesn't merit an article just because it exists. We don't have "profiles" here, we have '''articles'''. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 11:20, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
::::::@[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]]Okay. So being government doesn't mean it is relevant. I had been hunting for other sources also but there it is mostly passing remarks. So should I withdraw this article? Yes, articles terminology error being a newbie. [[User:Cacodemonwiki|Cacodemonwiki]] ([[User talk:Cacodemonwiki|talk]]) 11:27, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
:::::Are you employed by this organization? [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 11:22, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
| |||