Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notepad++: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Dark Shikari (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Textor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10:
*'''Delete''', I've tried it myself and it isn't bad, but apart from this [http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1593481,00.asp trivial PCMag blurb], I can't find reliable sources in English (there may be some in other languages). --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 22:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', a Google News search even of just the past 30 days yields a result, and there seem to be a number of nontrivial mentions of the program outside of the official website. —'''[[User:Dark Shikari|<font color="#0000bb">Da<font color="#000066">rk<font color="#000022">•S</font>hik</font>ari</font>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Dark Shikari|[T]]]</sup> 00:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 
* '''Keep''': to claim that this editor ''lacks notability'' seems unjustified. Just some examples for its notability: it has very active forums on SourceForge with over 10,000 postings, and also an active mailing list with 336 subsscribers and close to 11,000 archived messages. Traffic to the project site is substantial: http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/graph/detail-graph.php?group_id=95717&ugn=notepad-plus&type=prweb&mode=week&graph=1 Several NotePad++plugins are being developed, numerous translations exist, documentation, a FAQ, even branded merchandise - in short, this is a popular open-source project with a substantial community of developers and users. [[User:Textor|Textor]] 20:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)