Revision as of 09:19, 13 August 2025 edit Folkezoft (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 46,585 edits m Tag Bare URLs using AWB Tag: AWB ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 14:48, 20 August 2025 edit undo Citation bot (talk \| contribs) Bots 5,869,052 edits Alter: title, template type. Add: magazine, ssrn. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. \| Use this bot. Report bugs. \| Suggested by 16dvnk \| Category:Artificial intelligence \| #UCB_Category 13/198
Line 1: The '''Artificial Inventor Project''' ('''AIP''') is a global legal initiative headed by Professor [[Ryan Abbott (lawyer)\|Ryan Abbott]] dedicated to pursuing [[intellectual property]] (IP) rights for inventions and creative works generated autonomously by artificial intelligence (AI) systems without traditional human inventorship or authorship. The project coordinates a series of pro bono test cases worldwide, aiming to prompt law reform and public debate on how IP law should accommodate non-human creators.<ref>{{Cite web \|title=Research Portal \|url=https://openresearch.surrey.ac.uk/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/AI-Generated-Output-and-Intellectual-Property-Rights/99758265802346 \|access-date=2025-07-25 \|website=openresearch.surrey.ac.uk}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal \|title=AI-Generated Output and Intellectual Property Rights: Takeaways from the Artificial Inventor Project \|url=https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5083475 \|journal=Social Science Research Network \| ssrn=5083475 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite ~~news~~magazine \|last=Bedingfield \|first=Will \|title=The Inventor Behind a Rush of AI Copyright Suits Is Trying to Show His Bot Is Sentient \|url=https://www.wired.com/story/the-inventor-behind-a-rush-of-ai-copyright-suits-is-trying-to-show-his-bot-is-sentient/ \|access-date=2025-07-25 \|~~work~~magazine=Wired \|language=en-US \|issn=1059-1028}}</ref> == History == Line 15: === United States === In ''Thaler v. Hirshfeld (2021)'', a U.S. federal court agreed with the [[United States Patent and Trademark Office\|USPTO]] that inventors must be natural persons, rejecting the DABUS application and setting a precedent consistent with existing statute and administrative policy.<ref>{{Cite web \|last=Porter \|first=Jon \|date=2020-04-29 \|title=US patent office rules that artificial intelligence cannot be a legal inventor \|url=https://www.theverge.com/2020/4/29/21241251/artificial-intelligence-inventor-united-states-patent-trademark-office-intellectual-property \|access-date=2025-07-29 \|website=The Verge \|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web \|last=Willingham \|first=A. J. \|date=2020-04-30 \|title=Artificial Intelligence ~~can’t~~can't technically invent things, says patent office \|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/30/us/artificial-intelligence-inventing-patent-office-trnd \|access-date=2025-07-29 \|website=CNN \|language=en}}</ref> === European Patent Office ===

Artificial Inventor Project: Difference between revisions