Content deleted Content added
→Semi-protected edit request on 28 August 2025: new section |
Moubliezpas (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 144:
[[User:Billysee|Billysee]] ([[User talk:Billysee|talk]]) 05:27, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
== Why does 'SEO spam' link to this page, when this page contains absolutely no reference to SEO spam? ==
The page doesn't even contain any indication that SEO has any relevance to spam, or that anybody has ever connected the concepts.
According to the archives, the page used to contain information about the pros and cons, controversies, negative effects and social impacts.
Now all the discussion seems to be about exactly which SEO practices and companies can be promoted more.
Is it really just me that thinks if a practice is so frequently exploited for profit that the world's richest companies have spent decades trying to combat (according to [https://blog.google/products/search/google-search-update-march-2024/ Google], anyway) the Wikipedia page linked to 'SEO spam' ought to contain at least a section on the negative impacts, rather than a vague paragraph on 'black hat SEO' presenting the multi-billion dollar scam industry as a quirky trickster who occasionally changes hats? [[User:Moubliezpas|Moubliezpas]] ([[User talk:Moubliezpas|talk]]) 10:16, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
| |||