Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notepad++: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Notepad++]]: Please explain why you think this nomination was my fourth edit? |
Iamunknown (talk | contribs) comment |
||
Line 25:
** How does that make it notable? --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 18:06, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
*** Besides, there's a big difference between a [[GNU]] project and a project using the [[GNU FDL]]. On the topic of the deletion debate I'm inclined towards a keep vote, but the article certainly needs a lot of work both structurally and in terms of the citation of reliable sources. --[[User:Safalra|Safalra]] 18:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
* Looking at GNews, there are only a few news articles about how Notepad++ has a new vulnerability; Google search results don't turn up anything either (other than download sites). Since this is a purely online thing, I should imagine that, if it were notable, the program would be mentioned on ZDNet or other top tech news sites; it currently isn't. Doesn't appear to be notable to me, plus very few independent sources, so I'm leaning towards '''deleting''' it. --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 20:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
| |||