Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notepad++: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tasc0 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 27:
**** Like Safalra said, the article needs work, but it should not be deleted since it's an notable text editor and used by many people.
* Looking at GNews, there are only a few news articles about how Notepad++ has a new vulnerability; Google search results don't turn up anything either (other than download sites). Since this is a purely online thing, I should imagine that, if it were notable, the program would be mentioned on ZDNet or other top tech news sites; it currently isn't. Doesn't appear to be notable to me, plus very few independent sources, so I'm leaning towards '''deleting''' it. --[[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 20:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - Article needs cleaned up, Notepad ++ is a great software --[[User:207.13.77.47|207.13.77.47]] 01:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC).