Talk:Guru: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:02, 3 May 2005

Revision as of 16:14, 3 May 2005

Line 863:

::::Any fool can see that your edits are anti-guru advocacy. Your own comments on this talk page admit as much. For example:

:::::''I[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Guru#Dr._Feuerstein.27s_article_uses_a_peculiar_definition_of_a_guruI know from personal experience that Feuerstein's way of reasoning as expressed in that article can lead to disasters. Andries 17:56, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)]]''

::::Why would you say that? If all that you want is an accurate article, why wouldn't you say: "Feuerstein is incorrect in his description of gurus." or: "Feuerstein's facts are wrong."

::::The only possible answer is that your presence here is in order to keep people from following gurus. Which may be a very admirable mission, but '''''it is not the mission of Wikipedia'''''. In fact, to the extent that your mission conflicts with the writing of the article from a neutral point of view, your mission and that of Wikipedia are in conflict. --[[User:Goethean|goethean]] 15:58, 3 May 2005 (UTC)