Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diagonal method: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 6:
 
* '''Delete''' – The only ref is the method creator's original publication in which the method is introduced. There are no verifiable secondary sources, no evidence of notability. The method is brand new, the subject of a single article, in Dutch; not a notable topic. Since there is a verifiable source, it would be OK to mention the method in some other article on photographic composition, but a separate article is not appropriate. [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] 04:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete''' Could be groundbreaking, but this is not where ground should be broken. - [[User:Richfife|Richfife]] 04:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)