Computer numerical control: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
better structure and continuity of thought
Line 12:
At the time when M.I.T. was developing numerical control, engineers at General Motors were putting position transducers on the lead screws of a conventional engine lathe and recording the motion of the axes as the machinist put the machine through its paces to make a workpiece. The machine was also fitted with a servo system that took data from the recording to reproduce the same sequence of motion to produce a second, third and more parts. This technique is called record/playback and it is reminicent of a musician making music on a piano that has been modified to record his keystrokes on a paper chart to be read by a player piano to reproduce the music. The popular novel, "The Player Piano", is inspired by this machine. The author [[Kurt Vonnegut]] was exposed to the machine when he worked as a publicist for General Electric. Record/playback is different from numerical control in that the program is produced by the machinist in the process of making the first part.
 
The Air Force wanted numerical control and not record feedback because the latter put the machinist in charge of program production. This was the same machinist who was in a union andmember; whothus union strikes could result in delays in military production. Also, numerical control represented the ability to produce parts that were not possible with conventional, manual means. The Air Force used its deep pockets to get its way and while American manufacturing may have been better served with the simpler Parson concept or with record/playback, by now this is a mute issue. An entire manufacturing process known as CAD/CAM has developed around the NC concept and, in addition, CNC with its powerful microprocessors and other enabling technologies proffered from the personal computing phenomenon has enabled the NC concept to branch into may variants, even a variant that is essentially record/playback. In the industry, these machines are called teach lathes. In additional, powerful and well crafted human/machine interfaces allow the machine operator to prepare programs from interactive screens based on defining the machining operations and its obvious parameters (like the dimensions of a pocket) and not the tool path with all the calculations that this requires. Anyone today, who knows machining and how to read a blueprint can produce program at the machine without the need for CAD/CAM. Nonetheless, the vast majority of programs are produced with CAD/CAM and for most users, CNC today, for all its gigahertz microprocessors and megabytes of real time kernel software is conceptually no different from the first NC demonstrated by the M.I.T. in 1952.
 
If there is a difference in concept, it is that CNC is not just for the spindle and cutting tool process of stock removal anymore. It is for any process that can be carried on a machine tool motion platform that benefits from the separation of programming from operations, that is, from the CAD/CAM process. This includes lasing, welding, friction stir welding, ultrasonic welding, flame cutting, bending, spinning, pinning, gluing, fabric cutting, sewing, tape and fiber placement, routing, sawing and processes not yet invented.