Crackpot index: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m Restored lost material, removed OR comment about relevance to string theory
Line 3:
Presumably any positive value of the index indicates crankiness.
 
Though the index was not proposed as a serious method, it nevertheless has become popular in internet discussions of whether a claim or an individual is [[crank (person)|crank]]y, particularly in [[physics]] (e.g. at sci.physics). {{Fact|date=April 2007}}
 
The index contains the following line which could be considered a joke at the expense of string theorists.
<blockquote>
50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions.
</blockquote>
 
==See also==
Line 19 ⟶ 14:
 
* [http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html The crackpot index questionnaire]
* [http://www.crank.net Crank Dot Net], a list of allegedly cranky websites, roughly organized by subject area.
 
[[Category:Humor]]